![you tube a thousand years you tube a thousand years](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/athousandyears-140817000516-phpapp02/95/a-thousand-years-lyrics-2-638.jpg)
![you tube a thousand years you tube a thousand years](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nUKkews19n0/maxresdefault.jpg)
“It took away the overall focus on the kid and the overall focus on teaching,” said Erin Scholes, an innovation coordinator at a Connecticut middle school who has been in the classroom for 15 years. īut teachers said the focus on student growth measures stripped away the emphasis on building relationships with students. “We think the goal of great teaching is to have students learn and to have student learning be a piece of teacher evaluation, I think, actually gives the profession the respect it deserves,” said Arne Duncan, who served as President Obama’s education secretary from 2009 to 2016, in an EdWeek interview in 2015. Yet proponents-including the Obama administration-argued that tougher evaluations could identify, and potentially weed out, the weakest teachers while elevating the strongest ones. The evaluation reforms were largely unpopular among teachers and their unions, who argued that incorporating certain metrics, like student test scores, was unfair and would drive good educators out of the profession. “There’s not a null effect in every place where teacher evaluation happened. “There was a tremendous amount of time and billions of dollars invested in putting these systems into place, and they didn’t have the positive effects reformers were hoping for,” said Joshua Bleiberg, an author of the study and a postdoctoral research associate at the Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.